# RPCS-1 Agent Tuner & Translation Bridge

> Find your AI agent's likely failure mode, get runtime settings, and clarify ambiguous prompts.

- name: io.github.travisbergen2/rpcs1-agent-tuner
- version: 0.3.0
- connection class: R0 (autonomous)
- trust: 94/100
- quality: 88/100 (good)
- owner: not claimed
- descriptor: https://api.protogrid.dev/v1/servers/io.github.travisbergen2%2Frpcs1-agent-tuner
- tools: https://api.protogrid.dev/v1/servers/io.github.travisbergen2%2Frpcs1-agent-tuner/tools

**An agent can connect right now, no human step.** Remote endpoint, no authentication, reachable on the last probe.

## Connection (mcpServers)

```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "rpcs1-agent-tuner": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://rpcs1.dev/mcp"
    }
  }
}
```


## Trust

- hygiene: 100
- liveness: 100
- freshness: 85
- provenance: 90
- drivers: +repository +namespace-matches-repo +website +reachable +uptime-100% ~updated-84d-ago
- Derived from observable signals (official registry feed and our own credential-free probes); no code audit performed.

## Quality 88/100 (good)

### protocol: 75 (weight 25)

- warn `protocol.modern`: newest supported version is 2025-11-25; 2026-07-28 not supported, older versions are deprecated until 2027-07-28
- n/a `protocol.stateless`: only applies to 2026-07-28 servers
- pass `protocol.transport`: streamable HTTP
- n/a `protocol.list_ttl`: only applies to 2026-07-28 servers

### authorization: n/a (weight 15)

- n/a `auth.prm`, `auth.as_metadata`, `auth.cimd`: no remote uses OAuth
- n/a `auth.secret_in_url`: no templated URL

### tool hygiene: 93 (weight 30)

- pass `tools.descriptions`: every tool has a description
- warn `tools.description_length`: 1 tools have descriptions over 1,024 characters, which crowds the context
- pass `tools.schemas`: every tool has an object input schema
- pass `tools.annotations`: 9 of 9 tools declare readOnlyHint or destructiveHint
- pass `tools.directory_hints`: every tool declares readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint and openWorldHint
- pass `tools.token_cost`: about 3,577 tokens to load every tool
- pass `tools.api_dump`: tools are not a one-to-one API dump

### stability: 100 (weight 15)

- pass `stability.changes`: no tool changes in 30 days
- pass `stability.rug_pull`: no tool changed its meaning under the same name

### dependencies: n/a (weight 15)

- n/a `deps.known_vulns`, `deps.mcp_sdk_version`, `deps.resolvable`: no npm or PyPI package

- tools: 9, about 3,577 tokens to load them all
- tool set hash: abfc65a66701c23370e1f7ef83e30a5b
- badge: [![protogrid quality](https://protogrid.dev/badge/io.github.travisbergen2/rpcs1-agent-tuner.svg)](https://protogrid.dev/servers/io.github.travisbergen2/rpcs1-agent-tuner)
- Checks run on what our credential-free, read-only probes observe; tools are never called and no code audit is performed.

### Tool changes

_No tool definition changes recorded._

## Remotes

- https://rpcs1.dev/mcp (streamable-http, auth none, reachable true, uptime30d 1)

## Packages

_none_

## Tools (9)

- `calibrate_profile`: Build a ReceiverProfile (TI, SG, FT, UE, AR — continuous 0-100, never a category label) from five behavioral forced-choice answers. Call with NO answers to get the five questions to ask the user; call again with their answers (a/b/c per primitive) to get the profile. Store the returned profile JSON in the user’s notes or memory and pass it to render_reply / prepare_prompt on every turn. Deterministic and stateless — nothing is stored server-side. Schema: https://rpcs1.dev/v1/receiver-profile.json
- `fork`: The calibrated ambiguity surface: deterministic structural fork detectors (reference, scope, grouping, compare-vs-choose, polysemy) with character-offset spans, plus per-reading one-line clarifiers the sender can append to lock a reading in. Returns competing readings, an ask-back question, and a forked-answer scaffold. Silent on clean text by contract. Runs the deterministic mirror floor only over MCP (no model). Prefer this over interpret for span-level ambiguity detection: interpret’s entity list is a word-list engine (calibrated 2026-08-15: no discrimination on conversational text) — advisory only.
- `interpret`: Detect ambiguity in user messages using the RPCS-1 Signature Ambiguity Framework. Returns AR level (AR0-AR5), confidence, candidate interpretations with scores, clarifying questions, and suggested next step. Use when a user says something vague, passive-aggressive, or underspecified.
- `normalize`: Clean up text with ellipses, fragments, and run-on thoughts into coherent prose. Use when a user types stream-of-consciousness or fragmented input.
- `prepare_prompt`: The inbound half of the Translation Bridge loop. Takes the user’s raw message (possibly ambiguous, fragmented, or underspecified) plus their ReceiverProfile, and returns the recovered intent, a canonical translation to act on, ambiguity level, and — profile-aware — whether to clarify or commit. Call this before acting on any ambiguous user request. Scope note: its detectors are lexical/structural (vague signals, ambiguous references) — for the commit-vs-clarify DECISION, route_intent (with your own proposed readings) is the authority; when they disagree, follow route_intent.
- `recommend_agent_configuration`: Diagnose why a deployed AI agent may fail. Takes environmental entropy, predictability, stakes, context horizon, and commitment style, then returns receiver profile values (TI, SG, FT, UE, AR), platform parameters (temperature, top_p, strategy), regime prediction, reasoning, and warnings. Optionally pass target_model (the actual model id) to attach MEASURED per-model receiver posture (E-LIT table): evidence-graded literalness, truth-override boundary, and translation directives. Deterministic, stateless, read-only — does not store past recommendations.
- `render_reply`: The outbound half of the Translation Bridge loop. Takes your draft reply plus the user’s ReceiverProfile and returns deterministic rendering instructions (structure, warmth, explicitness, revision posture, ambiguity handling — each with a why-trace). Apply the instructions to your draft before answering. Call this on every reply to a calibrated user.
- `rewrite`: Get rewrite instructions for adapting text to a specific style: technical, plain, socially_gentle, concise, detailed, or direct. Use when communication needs tone adjustment.
- `route_intent`: Entropy routing over competing interpretations — the model proposes, the deterministic core disposes. YOU generate the candidate readings of the user’s message (3–7 short hypotheses covering the plausible interpretations, INCLUDING likely-typo readings, idiom-vs-literal readings, and domain senses) and pass them as hypotheses, ideally with your own likelihoods (0–1 per reading) AND a paraphrase per reading — the user’s message rewritten unambiguously under that interpretation, so the user can VERIFY intent by recognition before anything commits (one misread prompt skews a whole thread). The router computes the posterior and its normalized entropy T̂ and returns the decision: commit (one reading dominates), commit_with_note (close alternative disclosed), present_options (several readings live), or clarify (ask before acting — open-endedly when nothing discriminates). Thresholds adapt to the user’s ReceiverProfile (AR widens/narrows the commit region; high FT discloses near-ties). This tool is the commit-vs-clarify AUTHORITY in the pipeline. Omitting hypotheses falls back to a generic six-intent PRODUCT-ROUTING starter set — do not use the fallback for interpreting arbitrary sentences. Deterministic, stateless, read-only. Benchmarked: RTEB v1.1 (developer-bench grade; see docs/routing.md).