# Axcess — Design Accessibility Evaluation

> Evaluates UI designs for WCAG accessibility issues automated scanners miss. Paid via x402 on Base.

- name: io.github.sicxz/axcess
- version: 0.2.0
- connection class: R0 (autonomous)
- trust: 66/100 flags: no-repository
- quality: 88/100 (good)
- owner: not claimed
- descriptor: https://api.protogrid.dev/v1/servers/io.github.sicxz%2Faxcess
- tools: https://api.protogrid.dev/v1/servers/io.github.sicxz%2Faxcess/tools

**An agent can connect right now, no human step.** Remote endpoint, no authentication, reachable on the last probe.

## Connection (mcpServers)

```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "axcess": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://axcess-mcp-server.fly.dev/mcp"
    }
  }
}
```


## Trust

- hygiene: 80
- liveness: 100
- freshness: 45
- provenance: 35
- drivers: +reachable +uptime-100% -stale-207d -no-repository
- Derived from observable signals (official registry feed and our own credential-free probes); no code audit performed.

## Quality 88/100 (good)

### protocol: 75 (weight 25)

- warn `protocol.modern`: newest supported version is 2025-11-25; 2026-07-28 not supported, older versions are deprecated until 2027-07-28
- n/a `protocol.stateless`: only applies to 2026-07-28 servers
- pass `protocol.transport`: streamable HTTP
- n/a `protocol.list_ttl`: only applies to 2026-07-28 servers

### authorization: n/a (weight 15)

- n/a `auth.prm`, `auth.as_metadata`, `auth.cimd`: no remote uses OAuth
- n/a `auth.secret_in_url`: no templated URL

### tool hygiene: 93 (weight 30)

- pass `tools.descriptions`: every tool has a description
- warn `tools.description_length`: 2 tools have descriptions over 1,024 characters, which crowds the context
- pass `tools.schemas`: every tool has an object input schema
- pass `tools.annotations`: 3 of 3 tools declare readOnlyHint or destructiveHint
- pass `tools.directory_hints`: every tool declares readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint and openWorldHint
- pass `tools.token_cost`: about 2,090 tokens to load every tool
- pass `tools.api_dump`: tools are not a one-to-one API dump

### stability: 100 (weight 15)

- pass `stability.changes`: no tool changes in 30 days
- pass `stability.rug_pull`: no tool changed its meaning under the same name

### dependencies: n/a (weight 15)

- n/a `deps.known_vulns`, `deps.mcp_sdk_version`, `deps.resolvable`: no npm or PyPI package

- tools: 3, about 2,090 tokens to load them all
- tool set hash: 578a218e4c591ad27d0091ff4f8240be
- badge: [![protogrid quality](https://protogrid.dev/badge/io.github.sicxz/axcess.svg)](https://protogrid.dev/servers/io.github.sicxz/axcess)
- Checks run on what our credential-free, read-only probes observe; tools are never called and no code audit is performed.

### Tool changes

_No tool definition changes recorded._

## Remotes

- https://axcess-mcp-server.fly.dev/mcp (streamable-http, auth none, reachable true, uptime30d 1)

## Packages

_none_

## Tools (3)

- `evaluate_accessibility`: Evaluates UI elements for accessibility issues that automated scanners miss.

COST: $0.01 USDC via x402 on Base-compatible EVM network per call.

Checks beyond what axe/Lighthouse/WAVE catch at the design stage:
- Touch targets below 24×24px (WCAG 2.5.8 AA hard fail)
- Touch targets below 44×44px (WCAG 2.5.5 AAA recommended)
- Information conveyed by color alone without a secondary indicator (WCAG 1.4.1)
- Missing focus indicators on interactive elements (WCAG 2.4.7)
- Focus rings thinner than 2px (WCAG 2.4.11)
- Focus ring contrast below 3:1 against adjacent background (WCAG 2.4.11)
- Interactive elements below the practical usability height floor

Args:
  - elements: Array of 1–50 UI element objects
  - screen_name: Optional label for the evaluation report

Each element requires: element_type.
Provide width_px/height_px for touch target checks.
Provide uses_color_only + secondary indicator flags for 1.4.1 checks.
Provide is_interactive + focus_visible + focus indicator properties for focus checks.

Returns: Structured report with:
  - Per-element scores (0–100) and specific issues
  - Severity levels (critical/major/minor) with WCAG references
  - What automated tools miss and why
  - Concrete fix recommendations
  - Overall score and verdict (pass/needs_work/fail)
  - Top issues sorted by severity
- `evaluate_typography`: Evaluates typography elements against a principled accessibility rubric.

COST: $0.05 USDC via x402 on Base-compatible EVM network per call.

Goes beyond what axe/Lighthouse/WAVE can check — evaluates design judgment, not just
numeric compliance. Catches issues like:
- Contrast that passes WCAG 4.5:1 but fails visually due to thin font weight
- Body text that meets minimum size requirements but is still too small for comfortable reading
- Line heights that technically comply but impede readability for dyslexic users
- Extended all-caps or italic text that passes all AA criteria but impairs reading
- Text on gradient/image backgrounds where scanner sampling is unreliable
- Heading sizes that are technically correct but visually indistinct from body

Args:
  - elements: Array of 1–50 typography element objects with font/color properties
  - screen_name: Optional label for the evaluation report

Each element requires: element_type, font_size, font_weight, line_height, color_hex, background_color_hex.

Returns: Structured report with:
  - Per-element scores (0–100)
  - Specific issues with severity (critical/major/minor)
  - WCAG references and what automated tools miss
  - Concrete fix recommendations
  - Overall score and verdict (pass/needs_work/fail)
  - Top issues sorted by severity

Example use: Extract text layer properties from Figma using get_design_context,
pass the typography properties to this tool for evaluation before shipping.
- `list_capabilities`: Returns available evaluation tools, what they check, and their pricing.
Call this first to understand what Axcess can evaluate and how much each evaluation costs.

This tool is FREE. All evaluation tools require USDC payment on Base network.

Returns: JSON with tool descriptions, pricing, and rubric categories.
