# Token Risk Checker

> Base token risk screen: rug-pull liquidity, honeypots, copycats. Pay per call via x402 (USDC).

- name: io.github.DIMSUM1232011-svg/token-risk-checker
- version: 1.0.0
- connection class: R0 (autonomous)
- trust: 80/100 flags: no-repository
- quality: 86/100 (good)
- owner: not claimed
- descriptor: https://api.protogrid.dev/v1/servers/io.github.DIMSUM1232011-svg%2Ftoken-risk-checker
- tools: https://api.protogrid.dev/v1/servers/io.github.DIMSUM1232011-svg%2Ftoken-risk-checker/tools

**An agent can connect right now, no human step.** Remote endpoint, no authentication, reachable on the last probe.

## Connection (mcpServers)

```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "token-risk-checker": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://checker-production-40a5.up.railway.app/mcp"
    }
  }
}
```


## Trust

- hygiene: 80
- liveness: 100
- freshness: 100
- provenance: 45
- drivers: +website +reachable +uptime-100% +updated-24d-ago -no-repository
- Derived from observable signals (official registry feed and our own credential-free probes); no code audit performed.

## Quality 86/100 (good)

### protocol: 75 (weight 25)

- warn `protocol.modern`: newest supported version is 2025-11-25; 2026-07-28 not supported, older versions are deprecated until 2027-07-28
- n/a `protocol.stateless`: only applies to 2026-07-28 servers
- pass `protocol.transport`: streamable HTTP
- n/a `protocol.list_ttl`: only applies to 2026-07-28 servers

### authorization: n/a (weight 15)

- n/a `auth.prm`, `auth.as_metadata`, `auth.cimd`: no remote uses OAuth
- n/a `auth.secret_in_url`: no templated URL

### tool hygiene: 88 (weight 30)

- pass `tools.descriptions`: every tool has a description
- pass `tools.description_length`: descriptions are concise
- pass `tools.schemas`: every tool has an object input schema
- pass `tools.annotations`: 2 of 2 tools declare readOnlyHint or destructiveHint
- fail `tools.directory_hints`: no tool declares all four of readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint and openWorldHint; missing: check_token_risk (destructiveHint, idempotentHint); quick_token_risk (destructiveHint, idempotentHint)
- pass `tools.token_cost`: about 362 tokens to load every tool
- pass `tools.api_dump`: tools are not a one-to-one API dump
- pass `tools.hidden_text`: no hidden text in tool names, descriptions, schemas or annotations

### stability: 100 (weight 15)

- pass `stability.changes`: no tool changes in 30 days
- pass `stability.rug_pull`: no tool changed its meaning under the same name
- pass `stability.new_links`: no tool change named a new site

### dependencies: n/a (weight 15)

- n/a `deps.known_vulns`, `deps.mcp_sdk_version`, `deps.resolvable`: no npm or PyPI package

- tools: 2, about 362 tokens to load them all
- tool set hash: da2b7478fe0df73e68de0d8d95e889b1
- badge: [![protogrid quality](https://protogrid.dev/badge/io.github.DIMSUM1232011-svg/token-risk-checker.svg)](https://protogrid.dev/servers/io.github.DIMSUM1232011-svg/token-risk-checker)
- Checks run on what our credential-free, read-only probes observe; tools are never called and no code audit is performed.

### Tool changes

_No tool definition changes recorded._

## Remotes

- https://checker-production-40a5.up.railway.app/mcp (streamable-http, auth none, reachable true, uptime30d 1)

## Packages

_none_

## Tools (2)

- `check_token_risk`: Full risk report for a Base token, with an AI-written plain-English summary: whether the creator or launch wallet can pull the pool liquidity (incl. Uniswap V4), copycat tickers, launch platform (Clanker/Doppler/B20), honeypot and taxes, mint/pause/blacklist powers, upgradeable proxy, ownership and holders. Returns a 0-100 score, LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH level and per-check reasons. Automated risk screen, not a security audit.
- `quick_token_risk`: Quick risk check for a Base token: the same checks as check_token_risk (creator-pullable liquidity, copycats, honeypot and taxes, owner powers, proxy, ownership, launch platform, holders) without the AI summary. Returns a 0-100 score, LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH level and per-check reasons. Automated risk screen, not a security audit.