# Design Check

> Scores whether a page reads as AI-generated and names the tells to fix.

- name: com.allthepossibles/designcheck
- version: 1.0.0
- connection class: R0 (autonomous)
- trust: 83/100 flags: no-repository
- quality: 89/100 (new)
- owner: not claimed
- descriptor: https://api.protogrid.dev/v1/servers/com.allthepossibles%2Fdesigncheck
- tools: https://api.protogrid.dev/v1/servers/com.allthepossibles%2Fdesigncheck/tools

**An agent can connect right now, no human step.** Remote endpoint, no authentication, reachable on the last probe.

## Connection (mcpServers)

```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "designcheck": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://designcheck.allthepossibles.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}
```


## Trust

- hygiene: 80
- liveness: 100
- freshness: 100
- provenance: 55
- drivers: +dns-namespace +website +reachable +uptime-100% +updated-1d-ago -no-repository
- Derived from observable signals (official registry feed and our own credential-free probes); no code audit performed.

## Quality 89/100 (new)

### protocol: 75 (weight 25)

- warn `protocol.modern`: newest supported version is 2025-06-18; 2026-07-28 not supported, older versions are deprecated until 2027-07-28
- n/a `protocol.stateless`: only applies to 2026-07-28 servers
- pass `protocol.transport`: streamable HTTP
- n/a `protocol.list_ttl`: only applies to 2026-07-28 servers

### authorization: n/a (weight 15)

- n/a `auth.prm`, `auth.as_metadata`, `auth.cimd`: no remote uses OAuth
- n/a `auth.secret_in_url`: no templated URL

### tool hygiene: 100 (weight 30)

- pass `tools.descriptions`: every tool has a description
- pass `tools.description_length`: descriptions are concise
- pass `tools.schemas`: every tool has an object input schema
- pass `tools.annotations`: 3 of 3 tools declare readOnlyHint or destructiveHint
- pass `tools.directory_hints`: every tool declares readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint and openWorldHint
- pass `tools.token_cost`: about 505 tokens to load every tool
- pass `tools.api_dump`: tools are not a one-to-one API dump

### stability: n/a (weight 15)

- n/a `stability.changes`, `stability.rug_pull`: tool history recorded for 1 of the 7 days needed

### dependencies: n/a (weight 15)

- n/a `deps.known_vulns`, `deps.mcp_sdk_version`, `deps.resolvable`: no npm or PyPI package

- tools: 3, about 505 tokens to load them all
- tool set hash: 943867b2e9759c2a49cbf503a01d0709
- tools last changed: 2026-10-19T23:00:50.144Z
- badge: [![protogrid quality](https://protogrid.dev/badge/com.allthepossibles/designcheck.svg)](https://protogrid.dev/servers/com.allthepossibles/designcheck)
- Checks run on what our credential-free, read-only probes observe; tools are never called and no code audit is performed.

### Tool changes

- 2026-10-19 `check_code` changed (title, annotations)
- 2026-10-19 `check_copy` changed (title, annotations)
- 2026-10-19 `check_design` changed (title, annotations)

Full history: https://api.protogrid.dev/v1/servers/com.allthepossibles%2Fdesigncheck/changes

## Remotes

- https://designcheck.allthepossibles.com/mcp (streamable-http, auth none, reachable true, uptime30d 1)

## Packages

_none_

## Tools (3)

- `check_code`: Check a source file or diff for AI 'tells' left in comments: narrating fulfilling a request instead of describing the code ("as requested," "I've added," "here's the updated version") and hedge words. These reveal there was a conversation behind the change that a later reader has no access to. Call this before committing or shipping code an agent wrote.
- `check_copy`: Check marketing or outreach copy (an email, a landing-page draft, a pitch, a social post) for the tells that make it read as AI-generated: cliché vocabulary (delve, unlock, empower, seamlessly integrate, etc.), negative-parallel framing ("not just X, but Y"), hedge words, heavy em-dash use, and diagnosing a problem with no fix in the same breath. No page or markup needed, just the text. Call this before sending copy to a human.
- `check_design`: Check a page's HTML/CSS/copy/interaction for the patterns that make AI-generated work read as generic: default fonts, soft tech gradients, pill+arrow buttons, eyebrow labels, a composition with no real width/background variation across sections, uniform card grids, copy tells (AI vocabulary, negative-parallel framing, hedge words, heavy em-dash use), and experience gaps (a diagnosis with no next step, dead-end links). Every finding includes a concrete fix. Call this before presenting UI to a human.
